One of them still takes a SIM card.
In Hong Kong the Galaxy Z Fold8 accepts a physical nano-SIM and the iPhone Duo does not, in any market. Beyond that the two are closer than the marketing suggests: both reach 2x optical-quality zoom, and both pair two rear sensors of almost the same resolution.
What each maker states
Hong Kong models only. Both columns quote the maker's own spec page.
Both makers publish 7.6 inches, but each measures a folding screen its own way: Samsung states a full-rectangle figure and a rounded-corner one, Apple states a single diagonal.
Apple has never published iPhone memory, and Xcode does not yet support the iPhone Duo, so there is no confirmed figure to print. Samsung states 12 GB.
Apple states battery as hours of video playback; Samsung states it as capacity in mAh. Neither converts into the other, and no ratio between them would mean anything.
Apple publishes core counts and a chip name; Samsung publishes a clock speed. Comparing gigahertz across two different architectures says nothing about speed.
Why some rows refuse to answer
Where this comes from
apple.com/hk/iphone-duo/specs/samsung.com/hk/smartphones/galaxy-z-fold8/specs/Last updated 2026-09-13